I admit it; despite being a fan of the
new fantasy-noir subgenre, I avoided reading Richard K. Morgan’s The Steel Remains for a long time. I avoided it because I’d read reviews mentioning graphic rape scenes.
Rape in fantasy is a particularly touchy subject for me, because I’ve noticed a disturbing trend where writer utilize rape for shock value, or even worse, as setting/scenery, to show the reader that we’re really not in Kansas any more. The problem with this approach is that it reduces women to objects and makes light of the very real suffering of rape survivors. Unlike orcs, magic swords, and dragons, rape is real. And it should be written about; but not in a way that normalizes it or reduces the raped to the same plane as a burning tavern or slaughtered horse. There are not enough explicatives in the world to adequately express how I feel about that.
I’m not sure why I eventually decided to give The Steel Remains a go anyway. Probably I downloaded the first chapter onto my kindle app and was taken enough with the quality of writing to give it a shot. It is very well written, in the low fantasy style that dumps the “thous” and “mayhaps” for “screw you” and “oh hell.” Personally, I really like this stuff; I know it doesn’t work for a lot of people who want their mayhaps. (I know I get zinged by my writing class every time I slip a curse into my own work, and I’m really not sure where I stand on that any more. But that’s another post for another time.)
Now that I’ve read the book (and am halfway through the sequel, The Cold Commands), I’ve come to this rather sad conclusion regarding the rape scene:
1. The rape bothered so many readers because the victim was a teenaged boy (the protagonist, Gil, in flashback), not a girl, as we are sadly used to.
2. The rape bothered so many readers because it was written with clarity and pain, not as some sort of halfassed Lawry’s Seasoning Salt for this Brutal Fantasy World
I thought the rape scene was handled well, buoyed by the strength of Morgan’s writing. I can see it being triggering for survivors, but I imagine fantasy is a real mindfield for the easily triggered these days. That being said, I do have quibbles about the book:
First of all, I would’ve liked the storyto be longer because the last third felt rushed to me, when the mystical elements leading to the climax came into play, they could’ve used more fleshing out.
Secondly, I had a hard time buying into the romantic relationship that Gil got embroiled in during the latter half of the book. It, like the plot, seemed rushed.
Lastly, it irked me that the two male characters (one gay, one straight) both constantly had sex on the brain and got a lot of action while the female character (gay) was totally repressed, with no obvious cultural reason to be that way. It just felt unbalanced and weird, in a book chock full of sex, that the woman would be the one to deny herself. (By the way, this book is chock full of sex. And violence! Did I mention it’s fantasy-noir?) I’m not sure what Morgan was going for with that, but it had a slight whiff of subconscious puritanical bs about it.
Richard K. Morgan has a lot of talent, and my quibbles certainly didn’t stop me from picking up the next book, which I am thoroughly enjoying. So if you like fantasy and don’t mind a lot of violence, cursing, and sex (both gay and straight), you’ll probably like The Steel Remains. If any one of those elements has you curling your lip, skip it.
Either way, Morgan is definitely a writer to keep your eye on.




